<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avoiding Blacklisting while Maintaining Good SEO Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigforkweb.com/wordpress/index.php/2008/12/02/avoiding-blacklisting-while-maintaining-good-seo-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigforkweb.com/wordpress/index.php/2008/12/02/avoiding-blacklisting-while-maintaining-good-seo-policies/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tulsa Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.bigforkweb.com/wordpress/index.php/2008/12/02/avoiding-blacklisting-while-maintaining-good-seo-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Tulsa Search Engine Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigforkweb.com/wordpress/index.php/2008/12/02/avoiding-blacklisting-while-maintaining-good-seo-policies/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I think Google's guidelines are perfectly fair.  It helps to keep spammy sites away from being listed, and I believe it's all directed to help make the online experience better for the average individual.  I think Google's ultimate goal is to make their algorithm able to judge a page in identical fashion to an everyday user, determining the on-site SEO qualifications in this style of judgment.  Off-site SEO will always be more algorithm than human imitation, but blacklisting will likely always focus more on direct site content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google&#8217;s guidelines are perfectly fair.  It helps to keep spammy sites away from being listed, and I believe it&#8217;s all directed to help make the online experience better for the average individual.  I think Google&#8217;s ultimate goal is to make their algorithm able to judge a page in identical fashion to an everyday user, determining the on-site SEO qualifications in this style of judgment.  Off-site SEO will always be more algorithm than human imitation, but blacklisting will likely always focus more on direct site content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
